Like this story? Get daily updates and alerts of big news events. Enter your e-mail address:
MEDILL NEWS SERVICE
Seven dollars and fourteen cents.
That's all Patricia Pratt has left this month after paying her bills, paying for doctor's visits and buying her monthly ADA paratransit pass.
The 54-year-old has difficulty getting around. Rheumatoid arthritis has left her with no cartilage in her knees. High blood pressure and diabetes have made regular doctor's appointments a necessity.
When the cost of the Chicago monthly pass doubled from $75 to $150 on Feb. 1, Pratt doled out the $150, but at a high price. She made ends meet this month, but she isn't sure that her limited income of $630 a month will stretch that far for March.
"I just can't afford it," Pratt said. "I don't know what to do. I really don't know what I'm going to do. That means I'm going to have to stay in the house [in March]."
Pratt isn't the only paratransit rider considering switching to single-ride tickets, which remained $2.25 in Chicago.
Sales of the monthly pass dropped by 79 percent this month, from an average of 700 passes sold to about 150 passes sold in February, according to Pace.
"We believe it has reduced pass sales, but we've seen more of a movement to single-ride tickets," said Pace Deputy Executive Director of External Relations Rocky Donahue. "That's the trend we're seeing. They haven't left the system, they've just gone to purchasing a different fare medium."
Pace decided to double the fare for the monthly Chicago pass and not the others because its sales did not meet the state-mandated farebox recovery ratio of 10 percent. By state law, each transit agency must cover a certain portion of its operating costs with rider fares.
Providing door-to-door services costs an estimated $30 per paratransit trip, according to Pace. Only 2 percent of eligible ADA riders purchase the pass, but they account for 20 to 25 percent of trips on the system.
"I'm very empathetic to the situation," Donahue said. "I'm very empathetic to individual stories, but at the end of the day as a government agency and having laws that we must follow, this was strictly to comply with the state law."
Empathy isn't necessarily what Chicago paratransit groups want. They want action.
Members of Independent Movement of Paratransit Riders for Unity, Vehicles, Equality and other concerned citizens originally sought to delay the fare increase when they filed an injunction against the Regional Transportation Authority and several officials on Jan. 29.
The request for an injunction was denied, but the issue is set to go before a judge again on March 18.
Dr. Ayo Maat, coordinator of IMPRUVE, is still battling the fare increase. She has collected about 100 affidavits from paratransit riders and will continue to collect more until the court date.
When the time came to buy a monthly pass, Maat boycotted. She began relying on free Medi-car service, non-emergency transportation assistance for disabled riders.
Pace is planning on conducting several informational meetings throughout the city in the first two weeks of March. The purpose of the meetings is not to discuss the monthly pass, but to inform the public of the changes to services set to take effect the last weekend in March.
Improvements will include better on-time performance, shorter travel times for passengers, more vehicles on the street and quicker response times by phone operators, according to Pace.
Riders can partly attribute the service improvements to the reclassification of service areas in Chicago, Donahue said. The city will be split up into three zones: north, central and south.
While there are now three paratransit carriers to pick from, riders will now have one carrier designated to each zone. Two additional carriers will join in, providing services for subscription trips, or standing appointments made by riders needing to get somewhere regularly.
The problem - as many paratransit riders see it - is that riders traveling from the north to the south zones will now need to transfer.
Both Maat and Pratt fear they will have to wait out in the cold or in unfamiliar neighborhoods for their transfers. Donahue said passengers would be allowed to wait in the vehicle until the transfer arrivers.
Ninety-nine percent of trips will not require a transfer, Donahue said. For the 1 percent that will have to transfer, subscription trips may be offered to those taking the trip regularly, so they won't have to transfer.
Regardless of the slated service improvements, Pratt is more concerned with all the sacrifices she will have to make if she continues to purchase trips.
Visiting her elderly mother on the South Side, taking a video editing class or even stepping out to enjoy a hamburger with friends are luxuries she may have to give up next month.
"It's just the basics of life I'm dealing with just to keep my house running," Pratt said. "Just to enjoy the little things that I do have, it's costing me money."






Print
E-mail
Comments
Have any state legislators, city councilmen, county board commissioners, Congressmen, U.S. Senators, presidential candidates, transit advocates thought about an emergency plan to bail out paratransit riders who cannot afford the fare. PACE says oh, we have just gone to buying single ride tickets as if the fare is 50 cents!!
I am not alone when I say I have had to stop riding, not just stop buying the monthly pass. Figure out how much it coats at $ 2.25 for 50, 100 whatever amount of rides over 35 that people take who used to buy the monthly pass. No, we have not all just switched to single ride fare--some have, but some have stopped riding.
And some are still trying to figure out how they are going to get to all of their treatments and activities while others get to ride free on the fixed route, which they can't ride due to their disability or functioning.
Those who can honestly say that $ 150 is no sweat for them are not the majority of riders.
PACE says they have to follow state law, but chose to violate federal law.
Does not the ADA provide for origin to destination trips, so that riders determine if they need curb to curb or door to door? So why is Jay Medicar saying they only do curb to curb service?
And an interesting point was brought up recently by another rider: is it not a violation to ask a rider if they are going for a medical trip versus any other trip when the service does not limit the purpose of your trip--should he or she not have the same freedom of movement that fixed route riders enjoy?
Regarding wages, does not the Davis Bacon Act require prevailing wages to be paid for projects that receive federal funds? Paratransit drivers do not even come close at most of the carriers. prevailing wages would be union wages. What are union wages for PACE bus operators and CTA bus operators?
And drivers ask why they are required to get a CDL license if state law does not require it? Is it so they can be paid prevailing wages even though they should not need a CDL to get a decent wage? Or is it as PACE says or implies to be better able to demand more of the drivers by setting higher standards?
Why not pay efficiency wages to improve the quality of work and the worker?
Paratransit riders who are moving to the single ride ticket because they can no longer afford the monthly pass are taking less public transit trips and this is certainly one way of leaving the system.
Pace's claim that the effective elimination of the monthly pass by doubling the cost is not causing disabled paratransit riders to leave the system is an irresponsible, disingenuous claim that Pace will not be able to substantiate.
Just ask Pace to show an increase on single ride ticket trips that corresponds to the decrease in rides taken on the monthly pass. If I'm wrong there won't be a significant decrease in paratransit rides provided overall beginning in the month of February.
Forcing disabled paratransit riders to pay 10% of rides said to cost $30 each is to force paratransit riders to pay more than any other group of public transit riders. Claiming their hands are tied by the state law mandating this when they actually supported the law as they took control of Chicago paratransit operations is cowardly and misleading to say the least.
Anyone who believes that state law forces Pace to double the cost of the monthly paratransit pass should be asking the obvious: how can Pace continue to offer the single-ride ticket for $2.25 instead of $3 (10% of $30 claimed cost)?
Clearly there is room to pick and chose. Shame on Pace for picking on the disabled riders who supported Pace's pleadings for adequate state transit funding.
I will have to purchase my transportation vouchers at the end of this month and I found they had increases to 3.00 each and 30.00 per pack of 10. I was told they would not increase from 2.25 because that the state came through with the bailout money and now they increased without notice.I find that this is unfair but what choice do we have to travel during the winter months.
The Disability community has declared NOW IS THE TIME, it time for the disable to be treated as full human being.Disable can no longer except being shun to the side and told by those who don't suffer the disrespect because of a disability.PACE has a board with no Disable representation on the board. And this board has nobody from Chicago is represented on this board, Give ownenership to the disable and help solve the poverty in the disable community.
You do have a choice. You can boycott and ride someone else until we win our court case. There is a company named YOG that provides medical transportation for Medicaid recipients for free. They also provide private rides for pay. Eventually, we will win our Court case. Join us. Send in your affidavit and FTA Complaint. We are fighting this on behalf of all riders!!Ca us at 773-416-7366. We go back to federal Court. We will be in Chancery Court March 18, too.
The cost is the cost... gas prices are up 50 pct from a year ago, and buses run on diesel which is even more expensive. If you cant afford the fare, stay home.
I notice nowhere in the article it mentions the rider affected was going to a productive JOB or to WORK.
It sounds an awful lot like she is out roaming around bored, when it claims she has no cartilage in her knees to even walk. We need to concentrate PUBLIC resources on getting people to work, not ensuring that every elderly / wheelchair person is running the roads all day for free clogging up the buses and SLOWING DOWN bus timetables, for the people who still hold jobs and actually finance this mess with there tax dollars.
There are too many unproductive ``disability bullies`` who want a literal `free ride` and then turn into nasty disability bullies (or ``im a senior`` bullies), who demand the world for free and wish to pay nothing for their maintenance and upkeep. Helping the disabled and elderly is a noble act for the CHARITIES, but public agencies and NOT charities, and I dont want to finance anyone who is low enough to think the world owes them a free ride because they sue, whine and complain. i am sorry you have health problems, now go find a charity that is willing out of the goodness of their hearts to help you voluntarily you greedy disability bullies instead of milking a system built so that people (used to be able) to get to work on time, instead of having to stop for 25 ``seniors`` who are out cruising around becasue they have nothing to do all day, and were given a lifetime free bus pass by our jail-headed corrupt governor. If these disability bullies ever get their greedy plan forced through it, will destroy the bus service, because no one will ever be able to get anywhere on schedule when it takes 20 minutes to load each of these bored, roaming bullies.
This country is too soft- go to charity, stop leaching others taxes that you never paid, disability bullies. It is no ones responsibility but YOU to take care of you, let your family buy their own van with their own private money and ride you around all day bully.
Post new comment